Cuckoo Admin v2

Base details

Display

Checked

Original Title

Page Title

Pretty URL

Meta Title

[40] 50 - 60 characters.

Meta Description

[154] 50 - 160 characters.

Date

Author

Introduction

I bet a lot of people (read: women) would have read that double-page spread in last weekend's <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1262706/Secrets-experts-Which-treatments-beauty-editors-recommend--NEVER-again.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Daily Mail</a>.
It was a feature about what various journalists, reportedly at the top of their game have had "done" or would propose to have done at some stage.
The article overall was balanced in as much as some of the journalists would quite happily opt for surgery and others were happier to go for the natural look.
What was really frustrating, bearing in mind that these articles are aimed to educate the average consumer was the lack of cohesive information as it was very much based on the journalists personal experience and as we all know what suits the goose doesn't always suit the gander!  
One of the ladies actually dismissed Microneedling (Dermarollering) as taking too much time to recover from after only 48 hours and one of the journalists said that she had had a peel and based on her experience "would not be having it again".  
What strikes me about this whole article is that information and education to your client is so important to help them understand the procedure they are having and the results that can be achieved.
We are offering aesthetic treatments - not beauty treatments - they are poles apart. 
This misinformation scares people and deflects people from having treatments that could really make a difference. 
Education is key and informing consumers correctly is all our responsibility.

Current Info

I bet a lot of people - and when I say people I mean "women" would have read that double-page spread in last weekend's <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1262706/Secrets-experts-Which-treatments-beauty-editors-recommend--NEVER-again.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Daily Mail</a>. It was a feature about what various journalists, reportedly at the top of their game have had "done" or would propose to have done at some stage. The article overall was balanced in as much as some of the journalists would quite happily opt for surgery and others were happier to go for the natural look.
What was really frustrating, bearing in mind that these articles are aimed to educate the average consumer was the lack of cohesive information as it was very much based on the journalists personal experience and as we all know what suits the goose doesn't always suit the gander!  
One of the ladies actually dismissed Microneedling (Dermarollering) as taking too much time to recover from after only 48 hours and one of the journalists said that she had had a peel and based on her experience "would not be having it again".     What strikes me about this whole article is that information and education to your client is so important to help them understand the procedure they are having and the results that can be achieved. We are offering aesthetic treatments - not beauty treatments - they are poles apart.    This misinformation scares people and deflects people from having treatments that could really make a difference.  Education is key and informing consumers correctly is all our responsibility.

Add To Search Engines

ADD BLOCK BLOCK's

Order	Change	Type - Title	Update
-2	↑ ↓	Full Width Image-Medical Skin Needling	EDIT
-1	↑ ↓	Text Block-Medical Skin Needling products	EDIT
2	↑ ↓	Text Block-Microneedling clinics	EDIT

Banner Image

Please remove the banner below to add another.

Thumbnail Image

Please remove the thumbnail below to add another.

Main Video

Edit Blog